What is the value of exposure when exposure is all there is?

Mark Mulligan's avatarMusic Industry Blog

There is an existential debate going on at the moment, around whether streaming is paying artists enough. It may feel like a rerun of old debates but it is catalysed by COVID-19 decimating artist income. These are some of the key narratives: here, here and here.

In this piece I lay out the underlying economics of the argument. I also focus wholly on artist income as songwriter income is another topic entirely.

COVID-19 has reset the debate

The latest streaming royalty debate is not an isolated event. It is happening because COVID-19 has decimated live income, leaving many artists worrying about how to make ends meet. Last week, just before this whole debate kicked into gear I wrote:

“Live’s lockdown lag may have the knock-on effect of making artists take a more critical view of their streaming income. When live dominated their income mix, streaming’s context was…

View original post 1,102 more words

Unknown's avatar

About Dae Bogan

Dae Bogan is a music rights executive, serial entrepreneur, and educator with over fifteen years of experience in the music industry. Currently, he is the Head of Third-Party Partnerships at The Mechanical Licensing Collective.

One response to “What is the value of exposure when exposure is all there is?”

  1. Stan Greene's avatar
    Stan Greene says :

    Love your content bro. Great stuff

Leave a reply to Stan Greene Cancel reply